We’ve been following the fate of the unfortunate clipper ‘City of Adelaide’ for some time, both here and in the Forum, see: The Carrick or City of Adelaide is laid to rest.
Most people around Glasgow know the vessel as ‘The Carrick’ from its days moored on the River Clyde, where it lay between 1923 and 1989. Unfortunately, it also sank there on more than one occasion, and ownership eventually passed to the Scottish Maritime Museum. During the period 1992/1993, the remains were moved to a private slipway adjacent to the museum, and a number of scenarios followed, including the proposed deconstruction of the remains, and demolition. Fortunately, the latter option was deemed not to meet the requirements of deconstruction, which would have seen a proper historical record made of all parts and construction methods found.
There are more detailed listing of various incidents and proposals regarding the decaying vessel as it lay neglected in Irvine, and many of these were noted in the Forum thread mentioned above, and we will not be trying to list them here. Please refer to the thread for more information, if desired.
We also have two past Blog entries relating to the City of Adelaide:
June 1, 2011 – City of Adelaide is still rotting away in Irvine
January 4, 2010 – City of Adelaide rots while authorities dither
The Forum followed more current developments, including this article from August 31, 2010 – Culture Minister announces plan to save City of Adelaide/Carrick with Australian bidder
I had largely forgotten about things after this, as there did not seem to be much happening.
It seems that the wheels had indeed been ‘set in motion’ following the Scottish Culture Minister’s announcement, and I just found the following Media Release from the latter part of 2010, which I am pleased to be able to reproduce in full below:
Clipper Ship Cradle About to Set Sail for Scotland
28 October 2011
The project to return the world’s oldest clipper ship, the ‘City of Adelaide’, to Port Adelaide will reach another important milestone tomorrow with the completion of the base of a giant 100 tonne steel cradle. A ceremony at Gillman will herald the completion of the cradle base that will support the clipper during its transport from Scotland to Australia. The cradle base has been pre-assembled for integration checks and will be shipped to Scotland in a week’s time.
Valued at $1 million, the cradle has being jointly donated by over a dozen Adelaide and SA regional firms. The ceremony will take place at Samaras Structural Engineers who have donated both labour and materials to the project and will be marked by the cutting of a ribbon by Senator Don Farrell, a staunch supporter of the project and the descendant of a clipper ship captain.
Senator Farrell said “This is an excellent project that helps to mark South Australia’s 175th year. South Australians should be proud, as I am of the collegiate spirit of the engineering firms from across the State that have combined forces to build the cradle. The ‘City of Adelaide’ is an icon of the foundation era of Australia’s social and economic history. It is one of only four surviving sailing ships in the world to have transported emigrants from the British Isles to any destination and will be the only surviving sailing ship in Australia to have brought migrants here.”
Senator Farrell, George Samaras, the General Manager of Samaras Structural Engineers, Creagh O’Connor, the Chairman of the City of Adelaide Preservation Trust, and a group of supporters from the Trust and other donors will also attend the ceremony.
Adelaide firms Aztec Analysis and Bown Contracting and Drafting have designed the cradle so that it can be built over multiple South Australian sites, and then shipped to Glasgow in shipping containers for assembly underneath the ‘City of Adelaide’. The clipper and cradle will then be rolled onto a barge for transfer to a deep port, where it will be transferred onto an ocean-going ship for the voyage to Australia.
The ‘City of Adelaide’ and the ‘Cutty Sark’ are the world’s last two surviving clipper ships. Built in 1864, the ‘City of Adelaide’ is the elder of the two. It made annual runs for a quarter-century from London to South Australia carrying thousands of UK and European migrants. In Australia today, a quarter of a million living descendants can trace their origins to passengers that sailed on the ‘City of Adelaide’.
The ‘City of Adelaide’ currently sits on a slipway in Scotland and its owners, the Scottish Maritime Museum, are being evicted from the site. With few options, they called for tenders to demolish the ship. The City of Adelaide Preservation Trust lodged a bid to ‘demolish’ the ship by taking it to Australia in one piece. Late last year the Scottish Government announced that the Australian solution was the preferred bidder.
To date 75% of the project costs have been funded through contributions from Scottish Government, Adelaide City Council and Port Adelaide Enfield Council, as well as public and corporate donations. The South Australian Government is contributing land to display the clipper at Cruickshank Corner in Port Adelaide
From left to right, then top to bottom, the details of the above images are as follows:
- Parts pre-fabrication at Samaras Structural Engineers at Gillman. Photo by Richard Smith.
- Cradle fabrication at MG Engineering at Port Adelaide. Photo by Richard Smith.
- Cradle fabrication at MG Engineering at Port Adelaide. Photo by Richard Smith.
- Finished cradle components at SJ Cheesman Engineering at Port Pirie. Photo by Richard Smith.
- Cradle integration assembly at Samaras Structural Engineers at Gillman. Photo by Richard Smith.
- Laser-survey silhouette of ‘City of Adelaide’ on cradle. Cradle design by Aztec Analysis; cradle detail design and graphic by Steve Bown.
- The transportation cradle. Cradle design by Aztec Analysis; cradle detail design and graphic by Steve Bown.
- End view of transportation cradle and silhouette of clipper. Cradle design by Aztec Analysis; cradle detail design and graphic by Steve Bown.
- Colourised (real colour) laser survey scan. Laser survey and graphic by Headland Archaeology, Edinburgh.
Update for w/e Friday 27 January 2012
We received the following update:
Hot off the press from an Adelaide paper last week.
2 containers with 40 tons of steel for the prefabricated cradle have arrived at Irvine. 3 more containers comprising the rest of the cradle should arrive this month.
“The ship can be carried onto a river barge, taken into deep water and loaded onto an ocean-going ship which will carry it to Port Adelaide.“
Update for w/e Friday 10 February 2012
This was later found to have been reported earlier by the media in Irvine:
THE historic Carrick clipper ship will be ready to leave Irvine for Australia before the end of March, according to campaigners in Oz.
That’s when the Save the Clipper City of Adelaide Preservation Trust expect a giant 100 tonne cradle which will transport the vessel Down Under will be in place.
The first two containers of prefabricated components of the cradle arrived in Irvine on Friday.
The last three containers, each carrying 15 to 20 tonnes of cradle parts, are due in late February.
The trust proposed four years ago that the ship’s recovery to Adelaide be the major project to mark South Australia’s 175th birthday but they still need to find funding to ship the vessel abroad.
The plan is to roll the 150-year-old clipper and cradle onto a barge for transfer to a deep port, where it will be transferred onto an ocean-going ship for the voyage to Port Adelaide.
Via Carrick ready for the off – Irvine Herald. Dated January 13, 2012.
The real reason some sites went black on January 18, 2011…
Some of the cats fell out of the internet:
There are some grammatical errors that are understandable, but after noting a number of comments about Waterstones (or Waterstone’s) repeated attempts at rebranding, I’m left wondering what sort of accountability a bookseller has, as Waterstones (or Waterstone’s) seems to think that the correct use, or not, of an apostrophe in its name is not something to take seriously, or deal with consistently.
I have to confess that after reading numerous other blog entries, and the discordant opinions of many ‘experts’ in the area, I have emerged confused, rather than wiser, after reading them all together with the logic behind them.
In fact, rather than come down in print in this blog in favour of one version or the other, I’m abstaining. Not because I don’t know how to apply the sometimes troublesome little apostrophe, but because I am not a mind-reader, and do not know the intended meaning of the presentation of the word as the corporate front.
However, I will express one clear and distinct opinion…
To merely drop the apostrophe on the basis of its inability to be included in a web url is NOT sufficient reason.
That makes Waterstones (or Waterstone’s, or maybe even Waterstones’ in this case) offence no better than that seen in the case of the Greengrocer’s Apostrophe – or should that be Greengrocers’ Apostrophe?
The apostrophe is confusing enough for normal people who don’t write much and therefore don’t gain much experience in handling it.
Organisation such as Waterstones (or Waterstone’s) who are ‘in the trade’ should be helping to make things clearer, not muddying the water by using non-grammatical criteria to define their use of the little helper.
I can’t even boycott them, as I would not be seen dead inside a shop that has so many waste-of-skin celebrities through its doors, signing books they have allegedly written.
While it’s not the sort of full sale of an island we have noted on past occasions, it is notable that the residents of a village on an island have the opportunity to have a say in a community buyout.
Residents of a Hebridean village are being given the chance to have their say on whether to take over the running of their own village.
Scalpay landlord Fred Taylor has offered to give his 300 tenants control of their own land free of charge.
He says he has no plans to sell the land to anyone else and would retain the island if its residents decide not to take it from him.
Island residents to have say on community buy-out
Mr Taylor, who inherited the island from his father ten years ago, says the residents could set up their own community trust or join the larger neighbouring community estate managed by the North Harris Trust.
The Scalpay Community Land Steering Group is in discussions with Western Isles Council to hold a public ballot early in June.
The story began about a year ago (2011), when it was reported that the Islanders may get their island for free.
It’s not often you can find something good in something bad, and while the Isle of Bute might have suffered somewhat at the hands of the recent high winds, one of the consequences was the need to ship over some seldom seen hardware to the island, in order to effect repairs.
Clearly not put off by the idea of hanging around in an open platform dangled from a hook on a crane – haven’t these guys discovered ‘cherry pickers’ – Zak took to the air and provided a set of pics taken from the sky above Port Bannatyne.
I wonder if I would jumped at the offer? I don’t have a problem with heights, but hate being on anything at height that’s not secure.
Click on the pic below to be taken to the full gallery for this little adventure – views I suspect have not been seen before, and won’t be seen again, for a while at least:
I seldom dip into pure politics, point at particular items that are politically motivated, and don’t intentionally promote any political views here, but occasionally I see things that are so bad they deserve a mention.
The first is the spoof Downfall clip on YouTube, presumably some don’t want this seen, so here it is…
I would say that compared to most other spoofs of the original, the new words laid over it barely rate a scot of 1 out of 10 – but that’s probably because the creator was trying to make some sort of political point, instead of raising a laugh. It’s also hard to believe someone lost their job over this rubbish.
I’ll be interested to see what my mere posting of the spoof attracts in the Comments section, as this posting takes no political side. I neither applaud nor decry it, merely point at it, and observe the rubbish script. Some Downfall spoofs merit a rating of ROFL, this sad effort barely manages🙂
Godwin’Law states “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1.”
The above seems to have brought Godwin to the ‘real’ world:
ALEX Salmond is under pressure to withdraw controversial remarks he made about a senior BBC adviser who he compared to a high-ranking Nazi Party official following a row over the exclusion of the First Minister from a rugby broadcast.
Mr Salmond used the term “Gauleiter” – the name for a regional Nazi party leader – to describe BBC political adviser Ric Bailey after the SNP leader was blocked from appearing on a sports show ahead of the Six Nations clash between Scotland and England at the weekend.
However, Mr Salmond was accused of making an “ugly smear” and of “bully-boy tactics” by opponents for using the term, after his invitation to appear on the show was withdrawn at the eleventh hour on the advice of Mr Bailey because of “heightened tensions” over the independence referendum.
Having been an online victim of Godwin myself – such is the joy of moderating and administering various web sites and forums – all I will offer by way of comment is the observation that when one want to make a comparison, or insult, there are plenty of other terms than can be used, and which do not have clear Nazi implications.
‘Out of context’ my a***.
In addition, it’s a ridiculous excuse and an insult to the reader’s intelligence to suggest that someone’s whose stock in trade is public debate would use such a term without knowing exactly what it meant – and then try to use ‘plausible deniability’ to get away with it.
A tale of RET misinformation
I was about to have something of a more serious poke at a politically motivated person.
As regulars probably know, I tend to avoid mentioning ferry services as there are some seriously motived people with their own agendas out their, and they don’t take criticism kindly.
However, I did see some politics that hit pretty low last week.
An island blog reported:
However, when Bute wasn’t named specifically in the Scottish government’s plans, Argyll & Bute MP Alan Reid claimed the SNP had no intention of rolling the scheme out to Bute, saying: “There is no commitment to bring RET to Bute.
“All RET schemes have started at the beginning of the winter timetable in October. Arran starts October 2014. There is only one more October before the end of the parliament. Why did the Scottish government not say that RET would come to Bute in October 2015?
“If a Government gives a date for the implementation of a specific commitment, you can generally believe them. This is not the case here. We still have to fight for this.”
That would appear to be a categorical and well researched revelation by Argyll & Bute MP Alan Reid.
Apparently it’s not, and it’s just some political points-scoring, and based on misinformation – he does not even appeared to have bothered to check what he has said.
This was left to the Blog site, which did the responsible thing, and checked with the people who are responsible for RET:
ButeBites contacted the Scottish government for clarification on whether RET would come to the island. Transport Scotland’s Colin Grieve said: “You may be aware that the SNP’s 2011 manifesto contained a commitment to “continue the
Road Equivalent Tariff on the current routes, and look to roll out to the Argyll and Clyde islands in light of the Western Isles pilot”.
“I can confirm that these plans include the introduction of RET on ferry services to Bute (Wemyss Bay-Rothesay and Colintraive-Rhubodach) within the lifetime of this parliament.
“In addition you may be interested to know that contained within the Scottish Ferry Service Draft Plan recently published for consultation is a proposal to enhance the Colintraive-Rhubodach service, running the service through to midnight, thereby extending the operating day.
“The intention would be to include this proposal as part of the next tender for Clyde and Hebridean Ferry Services in 2013. The Draft Ferries Plan is out for consultation until 30 March 2012, and we would welcome your views on it.”
We have to be grateful that ButeBites at least knows how to research a story before publishing.
The bottom line
Given the two (or now threee) stories above, who did something that was serious enough to merit losing their job, or resigning after they were found out?
(No wonder I keep away from politics – I’d never get anything useful done! And I do also have to admit to assuming that all I have quoted above is correct, as I am not taking the time to check it.)
It’s never nice to see news of a business cease to trade, but when it looks as if it was a successful one, and that success might be one of the reasons, that makes the news even sadder.
Taste of Bute began back in 1999, with a view to marketing premium beef and lamb from The Plan Farm and to encourage other island producers to participate in a joint marketing venture. That it was still around, until the end of 2011, suggests it was doing something right. In 2008-09 the operation developed into the creation and sale of smoked meat, fish and cheese, and three additional staff were taken on in 2010 and 2011 to help run the expanded business.
However, it looks as if existing commitments on the farm, and the unfortunate increase in bureaucracy, regulations, procedures, that are associated with growing business which provides food to the public overwhelmed the operation.
I come from a non-food business background that was steeped in documentation and procedures, and that took me into quite a few food factories where I saw their detailed operations, and even though I was well-versed in such things, looking at the sort of regulations they had to keep on top of on a daily basis was… scary.
The owners have given their own account of the closure here:
It was interesting to see a raft of news items report that a device I was given a ‘poke in the eye’ for identifying as NOT being the device the BBC identified as the hero of a rescue story back in 2008 – We know where you are – has now (four years later) become legal for use in in the UK since January 12, 2012.
Previously, personal locator beacons (PLBs) had been restricted for use at sea and by aircraft crews.
Now, climbers and hillwalkers may use them legally.
The police across the UK are the co-ordinating authority for all land-based search and rescue incidents. Deputy Chief Constable Andy Cowie is the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland lead on Search and Rescue, whilst Deputy Chief Constable Ian Shannon is the lead in England and Wales.
In a joint statement, they said:
‘This legislative change will allow members of the public to use handheld PLB devices on land anywhere in the UK which when activated, will send a Distress Alert message that will be picked up by satellite and relayed via the UK Mission Control Centre (UKMCC) direct to the authorities.’
‘The UKMCC, co-located with the Air Rescue Co-ordination Centre (ARCC), currently at RAF Kinloss, will receive, process and verify co-ordinates for activations before informing the relevant Police Force via the Force Operations Centre.’
‘The Police Service has been at the forefront throughout 2010-11, in planning these changes and colleagues in Police Forces across the UK are fully aware of the changes in legislation. We have worked with the Ministry of Defence, the Maritime & Coastguard Agency, the Department for Transport and OFCOM to get the necessary protocols in place to deal effectively with a PLB activation.’
‘Mountain and Lowland Search and Rescue Teams are busy all year round’ they added, ‘and if we can take advantage of today’s technology to help manage and minimise the risk to rescuers and help speed up the whole rescue process, in an emergency, there is no doubt we can save lives that might otherwise be lost. It will also help reduce the burden on volunteer rescue teams and searchers across the UK. Satellite coverage is much wider than mobile coverage and we have to take advantage of that.’
If you are considering purchasing one of these devices please remember the following:
- The use of a PLB should be as a last resort for use when ALL other means of self-rescue have been exhausted and where the situation is deemed to be grave and imminent, and the loss of life, limb or eyesight will occur without assistance.
See more here:
Personal Locator Beacons – change in the law – North East Wales Search And Rescue
It’s nice to see some good news, and that a formerly abandoned and decaying country house in Scotland has been saved from dereliction before it had passed the point of no return.
Final plans for the house are yet to be announced, and the trust that will take it over has still to raise the necessary funds, but it says it is confident it will be able to do so.
An architecturally renowned Georgian country house has been saved after suffering decades of neglect.
Mavisbank House near Bonnyrigg will be bought by Midlothian Council which will then transfer ownership to a Preservation Trust.
Mavisbank house was designed by William Adam in 1722.
It is described by Historic Scotland as one of the country’s most important houses and is the first Palladian villa to be built north of the border.
It was gutted by a fire in 1974.
The Mavisbank Preservation Trust said it was confident it could restore the building.
The house is privately owned but the owners remain a mystery.
The council will use its power of compulsory purchase to buy it.
Ownership will then be transferred to the Midlothian Preservation Trust on the condition that it reimburses the council’s costs and takes full responsibility for the renovation work.
I have to admit that I still like the way that the Pitlochry Festival Theatre still delivers its programme with a satisfying ‘thump’ on the floor, as the regular mailing of the printed programme for each season is something to be read with consideration, rather than just scanned over, as I do with most web-based content, no matter how well produced.
You can also View and download the theatre’s brochures
This year’s collection seems to offer quite a few performances that appeal to me, which is surprising, because recent years have not had offerings that raised much interest in me, but then again, I am not a confirmed theatre-goer, so for something to attract me, it has to be a little different, or fall fairly squarely within a genre that catches my attention.
Since I don’t want to give anything away, you’ll have to wonder what caught my eye, however, I can say that those which interested were in this list:
When I had a rummage around the pics I had lying around, I was surprised to see that I had never stopped to take a photograph of the theatre. On reflection, I wasn’t really to surprised to learn this, as our arrival in Pitlochry was often aimed at being somewhere else, and a wander along the river to the nearby power station, or through the town itself, usually took priority, while visits to the theatre itself always seem to happen in the dark.
Although it now has a full programme of events, some years ago it was pretty quiet out of its main season, and we often just arrived for drive up into the area, and would find ourselves almost alone in the car park, sharing it with only two or three other cars, and the doors to theatre securely locked until the start of that year’s new season. There was a time when I even began to wonder if I would ever see inside the place.
However, I can still include a view of the theatre, which overlooks the River Tummel. The modern building is still a little unexpected to my eye, as I always used to imagine it to be housed in a little old traditional building – don’t ask me why. Possibly I read too many past histories before actually visiting the place for the first time.