Secret Scotland

If it's secret, and in Scotland…

Free film and TV location guide dedicated to memory of John Logie Baird

VisitScotland has produced a free brochure/booklet describing many film and TV locations in Scotland.

The publication has been dedicated to the memory of inventor John Logie Baird

A new guide to TV programmes which have either been filmed in Scotland or have Scottish links has been dedicated to John Logie Baird.

The Helensburgh-born inventor became the first person to demonstrate a working television in 1926.

Tourism body VisitScotland has dedicated its free book, TV Set in Scotland, to Baird to help mark the 130th anniversary of his birth.

It contains details on more than 60 programmes.

Baird’s son, Prof Malcolm Baird, said he was delighted the guide was dedicated to his father.

He said: “Television will celebrate its 100th birthday in 2026 and I am currently in touch with an independent producer and an experienced screenwriter, both based in Scotland, about a possible film or TV series on the life of John Logie Baird.

“If the project goes ahead, there will be no shortage of Scottish locations.”

Prof Baird said these location could include Helensburgh, which he said had kept much of its character from the time his father lived there.

He added: “Between 1906 and 1914 he studied at Glasgow’s Royal Technical College, now the University of Strathclyde, where an historic plaque has been placed in the electrical engineering department.

“A few blocks away, another plaque recalls his long-distance transmission of television in May 1927, from London to a room in the Central Hotel, now the Grand Central Hotel.”

New TV guide dedicated to inventor John Logie Baird

Baird Wonder Wall Wider

Baird Wonder Wall at Strathclyde University


August 31, 2018 Posted by | Civilian, Maps, photography | , , | 1 Comment

Everyone knows what ‘cadastral’ means, don’t they?

It’s taken me long enough to get comfortable with ‘sasine’, after becoming interested in house sales, and discovering nice people would send be regular updated from the Sasine Register, complete with addresses of house sales, and their value.

Now I have to get used to ‘cadastral’ as well.

For the record:

sasine:  In Scots law, either the act of giving legal possession of feudal property (in which case it is synonymous with infeftment), or the instrument by which the fact is proved. There is a general office for the registering of sasines in Edinburgh.

cadastral: from ‘cadastre’: An official statement of the quantity and value of real estate for the purpose of apportioning the taxes payable on such property; a public register showing the details of ownership and value of land.

(Please DON’T bother telling me I’m wrong, or any of the above is wrong – just use a different dictionary, and give me peace.)

So, why would anyone be wondering what some new/obscure words mean?


Land registration remains a hot topic, and time ticks away as we approach the deadline for 100 per cent of Scotland’s land mass to be registered on the ‘cadastral map’.

Latest figures from Registers of Scotland, who maintain the land register, indicate 66 per cent of all potential property titles are registered, leaving around 800,000 titles still to enter the new register before it is complete. Scottish Ministers have set a target of 2024; an irrefutable substantial task ahead for all.

The cadastral map itself is relatively new; launched as part of the changes to land registration enacted in 2012. Designed to provide clarity on who owns Scotland, it will (when complete) be possible to stick a pin into any part of it and see who owns the land and the actual extent of their ownership.

Cadastral map will, in time, show who owns Scotland

Anyone who has queried land ownership in Scotland in a remotely serious way will know that there are already projects claiming to be logging this data (and looking for subscriptions to support them), but I’ve never liked them as they seemed to have hidden agendas and political motives behind them, and some even had legal battles with various authorities. A pity, since data is neutral, and useful, but not if dripped out to interested parties by a biased owner.

The existing sasines, and presumably this cadastral creation should be free of such problems since they are official registers – but I suspect that very ‘officialness’ means someone will accuse them of being part of some ‘Land Owner Conspiracy’. Such claims seemingly being mandatory these days.

Map Of The Kingdom Of Scotland

Map Of The Kingdom Of Scotland

August 7, 2018 Posted by | Civilian, Maps, Surveillance | , | Leave a comment

End of an era as Shetland comes out of its box

I’m not sure how I feel about this week’s news that a new law has been passed at the Scottish Parliament to stop Shetland being put in a box on maps of Scotland.

Shetland lies 93 miles north of the mainland coast, but is often boxed-off on maps to allow the whole of Scotland to be depicted.

While I don’t approve of inaccuracy, I also decry the loss of established traditions.

The Bill means Shetland has to be accurately represented on any public authority maps, instead of being boxed-off in a non-geographically correct location, after a campaign by Shetland MSP Tavish Scott.

According to Mr Scott this is a “lazy mapping practice”, and he claimed: “The logistics of getting to and from Shetland are all too often overlooked, and this has a serious impact on the economies of the islands.

Mr Scott would seem to think we’re all “Thick as Bricks”.

Looking at viral videos on YouTube – he could be right.

Here’s how things used to be.

Shetland Map Box

Shetland Map Box

And here’s a more accurate view.

Scotland Shetland

Scotland Shetland

June 2, 2018 Posted by | Civilian, council, Maps, Transport | | Leave a comment

Save us from the ‘help’ of cycling activists

A couple of injuries kept me of my bike last year (not cycling injuries I hasten to add), so I ended up looking at more cycling  related stories than I might otherwise have done, and what I saw is beginning to worry me.

While I understand and appreciate the efforts of most who try to encourage change and encourage improvements, I’ve detected a rise in those who seem to be more interested in attracting attention, or demanding more extreme action be taken to achieve what they think is ‘right’.

Over the past few years I’ve seen a steady increase in dedicated cycle lanes (fenced off from adjacent traffic), pedestrian crossing with additional signals for cyclists (to cross some wide and busy roads), plus the arrival of a number of areas with signs showing that they are shared paths for pedestrians and cyclists.

I’ve had to use them only as a pedestrian, and didn’t realise how advance this steadily growing network had become in the east end of Glasgow.

I think these are great, and make frequent use of them now.

Yet when I happened to come across a Glasgow cycling activist’s blog – he was completely against them, called them a mistake, and said they showed the planners didn’t have a clue, and should be fired.

As far as I could see, he wanted sole ownership of any bit of road he was using, everbody else is to ‘GEROFF’ and claimed such mixing of pedestrians and cyclists could never work.

I suggest he tries riding on the shared path between Central Station and the North Rotunda. That’s busy with both, especially on nice sunny days.

The only problem I’ve had on it has been from asshat ‘expert’ cyclists there, who speed round the blind side of corners as if they are the only ones on the path, or like the one I met last night, who sped past me so close he almost scraped the paint off my bike. Not even the courtesy of ding from a bell, or a ‘Sorry mate’ as he sped off.

Getting back on my bike, I looked at some recent online route planners – most are pretty poor to be honest, and have not been updated for years, and lack much recent detail. Going by their advice, if I followed it, I’d be on main road as they’re missing many of the lesser cycle paths, and seem surprisingly reticent to use side streets.

I ride along to the Science Centre fairly often now (from Shettleston), and after checking the online cycle route planners was disappointed they didn’t show a route to Riverside (transport museum),  or Kelvingrove (art gallery and museum).

But when I was on the other side of the Clyde from the Science Centre I noticed the signs showed that Riverside was only 3 minutes further on, and that Kelvingrove was just another 3 minutes further on.

This was new territory for me, so… nothing ventured, nothing gained.

True enough, both venues were reached without any problems, and the one hazard on the road to Kelvingrove – crossing the very busy Argyle Street – is catered for by a controlled crossing with signals for cyclists.

Here’s the proof of those visits, via a route that’s almost completely segregated cycle path from the east end. Sorry the pics aren’t great – it was as dull and dark then as it appears to be.

I’d never have known I could ride to these place almost solely on various cycle paths. And if one ‘activist’ had his way, I wouldn’t even have the route!

I believe certain of the ‘activists’ and ‘extremists’ are not helping now. Their actions could even spoil things.

PS Waverley Science Centre Tower

PS Waverley Science Centre Tower

PS Waverley. Pics above and below can be clicked for a bit bigger. There are bits of the TS Queen Mary visible in the background, where it is moored behind the tower.

PS Waverley

PS Waverley

Riverside – Museum of Transport. The building extends to the left, but there was a fairly ugly tent there (you can see its reflection) for something else about to take place there, so I decided to get rid of it for the pic.



Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum.

Kelvingrove Oblique

Kelvingrove Oblique

May 13, 2018 Posted by | Civilian, Maps, photography, Transport | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ye Olde Glasgow at the People’s Palace

I’ve tried to get a pic of this old painting of Glasgow along the River Clyde for some time, but every time I get the catch home and take a look – it’s been ruined by reflections in the glass.

I finally managed to avoid them for once.

It’s worth spotting this painting in the Viewing Gallery at the top of the building.

Old Glasgow Painting

Old Glasgow Panorama Painting By John Knox

A little detail.

John Knox Panorama Detail

John Knox Panorama Detail

February 14, 2018 Posted by | Maps | , , | Leave a comment

We really do NOT live in ‘Concrete Britain’

Over the years I’ve dabbled with Secret Scotland, I gained the impression that many people held the belief that the country was not far from being ‘concreted over’, and that we were not far from running out of green land, or even farmland for that matter, and being unable to grow crops.

While I hardly had the time or resources to sit down and disprove that view with facts, from using online resources to search for lost and hidden places, it was pretty obvious that this was actually yet another myth promoted by my sad old friends, the ‘Green Loonies’.

That there is a clear distinction between Scotland, Wales, and England in terms of land use for building, is not in dispute, with England having much denser built-up areas (and a much higher population to match) it’s still far from anything an alarming coverage.

Perhaps I have the advantage on living in the suburbs, on the edge of the city, and within smelling range of farms.

But this article is probably right when it notes that most people make the mistake of living in a densely populated and built-up city area, and equating the small area they are intimately involved with, with that of the majority of the land.

It’s actually rather nice, not to mention reassuring, to have this coverage researched and quantified.

It’s worth considering the detail given in the opening section, and taking in just how far out the uniformed estimate was:

The British people, it appears, have the mistaken belief that much of the UK has been concreted over. Could it be that the psychological impact of city living means people have a distorted idea of what our own country looks like?

This misunderstanding is suggested by new survey data produced by Ipsos Mori. Asked how much of the UK’s land area is densely built on, the average estimate was 47%. The far more accurate figure – based on satellite images – as highlighted in my blog last November, is 0.1%.

The average Briton thinks 356 times more of our nation’s land is concrete jungle than is the reality.

This isn’t just a minor misconception. The error helps to distort our mental picture of the UK and shift the politics of land use.

If the UK is viewed as a large football pitch, the people in the survey reckoned that almost all the ground between the goal-line and half-way line is densely developed when, in reality, it would fit into the tiny arc marked for taking a corner.

The 0.1% figure for what is designated “continuous urban fabric” (CUF) was named UK Statistic of the Year by the Royal Statistical Society (RSS) last month.

RSS president Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter said “whatever side of the argument you sit on, this statistic gives true insight into the landscape of the United Kingdom”.

Via The illusion of a concrete Britain

Land Use In The UK

Land Use In The UK

This was revealed in an earlier article regarding the same data, but was not accompanied by the same reveal on how far out many people’s assumption of the figure was.

Five mind-blowing facts about what the UK looks like

This earlier article is interesting as it had an open ‘Comments’ area provided.

By and large, and while I don’t want to encompass ALL the commenters, it’s worth a look – it might provide enlightenment as regards my gleeful use of the term ‘Green Loonies’, and how ignorant and self-centred many of the commenters are, giving little regard to the overall information provided, and merely concerned that ‘their’ little bit green has traffic jams or slow commutes.

I suspect they are the same people who think the Met Office is utterly useless at forecasting, and should be closed down as it rained in their street on the day a weather forecast for the area advised sunny spells were expected.

January 4, 2018 Posted by | Civilian, Maps | | Leave a comment

So THAT’s how land is used

Just kidding – there’s no real surprise or shock news in this recently published survey, but it is handy to be able to punch in your own postcode and see just how the variation applies locally.

Bearing in mind of course, postcodes are just an approximation to a location (you do know they were created for posties to use in planning deliveries, not as geographic area references, don’t you?).

My own is interesting, while I actually live in an area that was once farmland, yet my postcode tells the world I live in Glasgow city.

According to it, I live in a densely built up area.

But, like weather forecasts, if you are one of the few who are yet to have your brain liquefied by staring at a mobile phone during all your waking hours, this is a handy reference.

Via Five mind-blowing facts about what the UK looks like

Or find the original source material here:

A Land Cover Atlas of the United Kingdom (Document)

UK Land Use By Nation

UK Land Use By Nation

November 19, 2017 Posted by | Civilian, council, Maps | | Leave a comment

Relief model of Glasgow spotted at Kelvingrove

This was a bit of a recent surprise (for me at least) and was, unfortunately, tripped over in the midst of a rather wet day of heavy showers when I couldn’t dress appropriately for such things.

Spotting it depends on which road you take to Kelvingrove, and this is not my usual path, so I might never have seen it. Thanks to the weather, I couldn’t really stop for a closer look, so it was really just a case of grabbing some pics to make sure I remember it in future.

Glasgow Model Outside Kelvingrove

Glasgow Model Outside Kelvingrove

Thanks to the falling rain, I couldn’t make out the description on the plaque at the foot, and this also made pics almost unreadable too, so I’ll have to get back some day (or track it down online).

The actual features of the model are impossible to see in the above pic, so here’s a closer look at the top:

Glasgow Model Outside Kelvingrove Detail

Glasgow Model Outside Kelvingrove Detail

I hope it IS Glasgow, since I’ve just assumed this.

Given the sparse nature of the city, it has to be based on early maps, which I’d guess from around 1800 (very roughly) but would have to dig out some of my old history books to more certain or accurate about.

August 26, 2017 Posted by | Civilian, Maps, photography | , | Leave a comment

Map of Scotland’s wild land published

I’ve been watching this map being drawn together for some years, and confess that I’m not entirely sure what it will be used for, so am interested to see the comments made by SNH (Scottish Natural Heritage) and will be watching the media to see where it is mentioned in the coming years.

If not familiar with ‘wild land’, then some idea of what is meant can be gained by referring to this publication: Scottish Planning Policy (paragraph 128) which states: “The most sensitive landscapes may have little or no capacity to accept new development. Areas of wild land character in some of Scotland’s remoter upland, mountain and coastal areas are very sensitive to any form of development or intrusive human activity and planning authorities should safeguard the character of these areas in the development plan.”

In publicising the availability of this new map, the media noted:

Scottish Natural Heritage has published its final version of a map showing where Scotland’s wild land is.

The 42 areas include large parts of the Cairngorms and Wester Ross and also places in Argyll, the Western Isles, Orkney, Shetland and south of Scotland.

In total, the areas cover 19.5% of Scotland and the new map replaces one published last year.

The map has been produced to support the Scottish government’s new National Planning Framework and Scottish Planning Policy.

SNH said the map identified the most extensive areas of the “highest wildness in Scotland” that were considered nationally important.

Ian Jardine, SNH chief executive, said the map would guide development in areas recognised as wild land.

He said: “The planning documents launched today do much more than recognise the importance of the wild land resource.
Stac Pollaidh Scotland’s landscape has been described as a key asset

“They also recognise the extensive role of nature and landscape in the wider sense, and people’s enjoyment of it, in achieving sustainable economic growth.”

Via: Wild land map published for Scotland

This is the link to the map itself:

Mapping Scotland’s wildness – Scottish Natural Heritage

Wild Land

Wild Land – Crown Copyright image

June 23, 2014 Posted by | Civilian, Maps | , , | 1 Comment

PastMap integrates five heritage databases on one online map

Scotland map

Just announced by RCAHMS (Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland) today, April 25, 2013:

A web-based mapping service which goes live this week provides a single gateway into every aspect of the historic environment in Scotland, from archaeology and historic buildings, to industrial heritage and designed landscapes.

PastMap is a free, interactive mapping tool which pools information from five key heritage databases, providing a first port of call for anyone interested in the nation’s historic environment, from students and researchers to land managers and the general public.

Hosted by RCAHMS, PastMap consolidates data from organisations including Historic Scotland, local authorities, and RCAHMS itself. You can explore maps of Scotland featuring their particular areas of interest, choosing from the multiple layers of archaeological and architectural information to find what you need. This will allow you to:

Obtain listing information on more than 46,000 buildings which have been granted listed building protection by Historic Scotland
Explore information and imagery on over 300,000 architectural, archaeological, industrial and maritime sites through Canmore, the RCAHMS database
Access details on the 8,000 Ancient Monuments whose importance has been recognised by being granted ‘Scheduled Monument’ status by Historic Scotland.
Investigate Historic Environment Records prepared by the 17 Scottish local authorities who currently participate in PastMap, recording the historic environment at a local level
Discover details of gardens or designed landscapes which have received recognition and a degree of protection through the planning system from Historic Scotland

Fiona Hyslop, Cabinet Secretary for Culture and External Affairs, said how useful it was to see all of this information about the built heritage of Scotland made easily accessible on one website. “Understanding our past and being able to view and use the records of Scotland’s historic environment will prove to be an invaluable tool. PastMap is at the forefront of an exciting digital area – the spatial presentation of data from multiple sources. In this regard the heritage sector is leading the way in Scotland. This resource merges information from a range of partners and is an excellent example of different and diverse organisations coming together and working for the greater common good”.

Robin Turner, Head of Survey and Recording at RCAHMS said, “PastMap will continue to incorporate new data from RCAHMS, Historic Scotland, local authorities and other sources, to ensure that the site remains the benchmark for information about the nation’s historic places.”

Via Mapping Scotland’s Historic Environment Online – News – RCAHMS

Reproduced by Open Government Licence

This has to be something that could be described as long overdue.

We are heavy users of the various online historic databases and mapping services offered by the various local authorities, but it has always been frustrating to access multiple system repeatedly in order to drill down into what should have been a single service.

Even more frustrating is (or was) the moment you got fed up trying, and asked someone if they knew, only to find their reply was a url pointing at the one online resource you didn’t get around to looking at when your patience gave out and you stopped working through them.

I’ve occasionally both criticised and defended the various systems in discussions about their relative merits, but am now pleased that usually countered negative remarks by pointing out that however slowly it may have been changing, these various systems were all moving forward and getting slowly better.

PastMap is not a new name or service, but what we see there today is a vast improvement on what used to be on offer.

I only have one ongoing grouse and major complaint with these systems, and the “new” PastMap is no exception – being made to feel like a criminal when first arriving to use them, and being presented with a volume of War & Peace to which I must agree as their Terms & conditions, and End User Agreement, and whatever else.

It’s simply unnecessary overkill, since if anyone does anything that is legally enforceable, then this agreement means nothing, the law will deal with sin of sufficient magnitude.

I didn’t read it, but I clicked it, so if I did do something naughty, it’s probably unenforceable since I failed to complete my part of the contract from the start, by agreeing without reading, and rendering it invalid.

Find the new PastMap here:


April 25, 2013 Posted by | Maps | , , , | Leave a comment

Street View now covers more Scottish coastline (but where?)

Rocky coast

I don’t know where the email alert I should have received from Google about its most recent updates to Maps and Street View has been since March 7 (the date on the message) but it only arrived last night.

As I have lamented before, while Google used to have someone prepare an overlay that showed where on Google Earth the latest imagery updates were applied, this stopped a while ago, and has not returned, so I can’t point at specifics, which I like to do, both for my own information, and to make it easier for those who were interested to find their area if it was included.

So, all I can say is that the latest alert regarding updated Street View imagery (and this alert was about Street View, as opposed to the more general Aerial or Satellite View), is that it applied to some areas of Scottish coastline… and some UK cities, specifically:

In the UK we’re refreshing some imagery in major cities like London, Manchester, Glasgow and Cardiff, as well as filling in some of the gaps where we had no Street View coverage. For example, we’ve added brand new images to parts of the Scottish coastline, in pockets of East Anglia and parts of South Wales.

There’s also the mention in there of Glasgow having update imagery in Street View, and I think I actually saw this before reading the email.

For those who know the city, if you use Street View to head up York Street from the river, and cross Argyle Street, then you will see the wall on your right magically transformed from an abandoned piece of waste into a series of large artistic murals as caught in 2012. To see the old wall, just cross over to West Campbell Street, and look back to see 2008:

Google views abandoned Fukushima

I just happen to be looking at this exploration – Urban Exploration? – at the moment, so pass on the link since I am mentioning Street View.

Google Maps, working with Namie-machi mayor Tamotsu Baba, drove Google Street View cars through the abandoned town this month. In a blog post, Baba explained why: “Many of the displaced townspeople have asked to see the current state of their city, and there are surely many people around the world who want a better sense of how the nuclear incident affected surrounding communities.”

Click here to go to the scene

The are still boats lying inland, and the citizens are not allowed to return to their homes.

It’s hard to comment from a distance (and this is on the opposite side of the World) but I think I am reasonably safe in saying they could go home today were it not for the fear spread by radiophobia. As far as I know, there was no fallout from Fukushima, only the release of radioactive gasses at the time of the earthquake and tsunami that did the damage. More people were actually harmed and died from that than anything that happened at the nuclear power stations, but it is still the nuclear power station that are being pointed at as the villains of the story.

There were no casualties caused by radiation exposure, approximately 25,000 died due to the earthquake and tsunami, and more than 200,000 were evacuated.

By March 2013, reports indicated barely detectable effects on the population’s lifetime from the disaster at the power station.

Lest I get misquoted, I am not saying there are no effects to be found, and it should not be forgotten that the sea will be suffering contamination as heavy elements are washed out from the damaged plant, but this does not go to the town, it goes to the sea, to the fish for example, so these are probably not the best diet for locals. Actually they’re very good for anyone, as they seem to have well over 200 time the safe limit of radiation.

You might want to read this before thinking I am mad suggesting that the Fukushima residents might just be allowed back into their homes:

The Psychology of Cancer Clusters : Fire in the Mind

March 29, 2013 Posted by | Maps | , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: