Secret Scotland

If it's secret, and in Scotland…

Activists’ selective blindness won’t let them see this, so…

I’d better mention it so that genuine cyclists are made aware.

I’ve mentioned before the slightly disturbing trend I’ve begun to realise exists, where activists and campaigners appear to selectively ignore any positive news about their pet subject (whatever it may be, this doesn’t just apply to cycling, although that is the subject of this post), while maintaining their stance of “Nobody does anything!” in respect of their chosen subject.

I spotted two news items regarding the growing trend of cyclist, and pedestrian, favour in new transport strategies and plans.

Of course, the grumpy activist/campaigners weren’t far away, throwing their bountiful supplies of cold water around as usual.

I think the phrase I like these days is that “You can catch more wasps with honey than vinegar”, and these whining activist/campaigners are in danger of alienating the people they need to support them by seldom, if ever, praising schemes.

I don’t mind admitting they’ve lost me – and I now only mention them to mock them. I’m tired of their endless whining, and no longer even refer to their web sites. MY EARS HURT!

The news said:

Radical plans to reclaim roads for cyclists and walkers including creating the “most accessible community in Scotland” have won £60 million of Scottish Government funding.

The campaigners said:

However, campaigners Cycling UK said far more money must be allocated.

Cyclists and walkers get more space on Scottish roads under £60m boost

There was a specific feature giving more details of work to be undertaken in Glasgow.

MAJOR projects to improve walking and cycling provision in Glasgow have been awarded a total of £25million.

The funding is part of the Places for Everyone programme run by active travel charity Sustrans Scotland and Transport Scotland.

The money will go to two initiatives:

— Glasgow City Council’s Avenues Plus which will extend the existing Glasgow Avenues project to more areas. The £19million investment will provide segregated cycling facilities and footway improvements on a number of streets leading to and from the City Centre

— The £13million Yorkhill and Kelvingrove Cycling Village, led by Yorkhill and Kelvingrove Community Council (YoKeCoCo) in partnership with the city council, will receive £6.5million from Places for Everyone with a further £6.5million form the council.

£25MILLION Boost For Glasgow’s Cycling And Walking Transformation

Sadly, the latter part of that announcement was greeted with scorn and insults from a group I’m not going to give any publicity to – other than suggest they live to the northeast of Glasgow.

Their response to the funding announcement was not one of congratulation, but of scorn and derision, as it claimed the poor people of the northeast were once again being ignored and victimised, while the money, as usual, went to the well-off and wealthy west end of the city, where it ALWAYS goes.

Yup, THAT’S going to help win friends and influence people (that matter).

I’m so glad I don’t live in that part of the east end of Glasgow – although that lot probably hate me already since our ‘bit’ is actually getting some new cycle routes extending from our area into the city centre, with work on the first phase due to start soon.

They (and many others) need to move on, not stay stuck with their outdated, whining, and even aggressive views.

I need to stop their attitude making me feel as if this is how people see me when I go out on my bike these days.

Seriously – I cycle at about 7 mph when around people on paths, yet they STILL feel the need to tell their children to move out of my way, or get between me and them, even if 2 metes or more away.

Cycle Path

Cycle Path hint

Update

There was more on the policy published later.

While I understand, and don’t disagree (as opposed to agreeing with) the priorities listed in the article, ministers and interested parties should take care over how they address discriminatory policies which will be created by this policy.

While everyone generally applauds things such as ‘Positive Discrimination’, like the activist/campaigners I mentioned above, they also tend to turn a blind eye to the consequences of that ‘Positive Discrimination’, and ignore or forget those who are consequently discriminated against, and suffer ‘Negative Discrimination’ as a result.

There is seldom, if ever, any reporting, analysis, or consideration for them.

Walkers and cyclists to get priority over everyone else on the roads in developing Scotland’s transport, writes Alastair Dalton

Scotland’s latest transport blueprint was not launched with vague notions but a very clear signal about the direction of travel. What must be one of the biggest single cycling and walking announcements to date accompanied the publication of the new National Transport Strategy last week.

A total of £60 million will be spent on what will effectively be the transfer of road space from motor vehicles to cyclists and walkers.

Five projects to provide segregated lanes for cyclists and pedestrians in Arbroath, ­Edinburgh, Glasgow and Perth will be funded by narrowing roads, including dual carriageways. It comes two years after a contest for similar schemes saw all five shortlisted projects being approved. Only one winner had been expected, in line with previous rounds.

In what may infuriate those wedded to their cars, the Scottish Government’s new strategy also includes an inverted pyramid to illustrate its “sustainable travel hierarchy” – showing where the priorities now lie.

This has walking and “wheeling” – wheelchairs – at the top, with cycling beneath, then public transport such as buses and trains, ­followed by taxis and ‘shared transport’ like minibuses, and cars at the bottom.

The document makes it quite clear who will come first: “We will embed the hierarchy in decision making so that walking, cycling and public and shared transport are promoted and take precedence ahead of private car use.”

Scottish ministers’ new transport priorities put lone drivers at the bottom

Advertisements

09/08/2019 Posted by | Civilian, council, Transport | , , , | Leave a comment

Are you safe behind a personalised registration?

After the recent(ish) stupidity (from ‘The Church’ would you believe?) in Glasgow when a registration number featuring the letters ‘FTP’ was offered for sale (I still don’t understand what is wrong with File Transfer Protocol), I’ve wondered if it’s safe to even have some numbers on your car if a supposedly responsible organisation takes that attitude to something that has been around for years. Many years in fact, as the numbers are ‘dateless’, having no prefix or suffix year letter. Numerous vehicles have been circulating on the streets (including Glasgow) for years, with no problem. Some have lived near me, but I never thought of them as being worthy of a pic, or adding to my ‘collection’.

Now, with a supposedly responsible organisation (‘The Church’) creating a fuss over nothing AND irresponsibly whipping up emotions, one has to wonder about personal safety if the likes of mad activist groups such as political extremists, or Excretion Revulsion decide to target cars/drivers if they deem their numbers as ‘unacceptable’.

A couple of examples that come to mind…

Glasgow Taxi [2 SNP]

Glasgow Taxi [2 SNP]

Anon donated pic (an email offering inspired by my ‘The illegals’ series), so no idea where this one lives…

2011 Range Rover [PO11 UTE]

2011 Range Rover [PO11 UTE]

07/06/2019 Posted by | photography, Transport | , , , , | Leave a comment

The stories cycling activists must hate – and I hope I live to see delivered

I’ve really come to loathe and despise most activists and campaigners, but as with all generalisations, have to be clear I’m only referring to those who see their campaigns as a job, and one they will be out of if they ever acknowledge the delivery of anything they are campaigning for.

I’m not going over old ground, like some sort of broken record – there are enough old posts filed on the subject in this blog.

So…

I was intrigued, but NOT surprised (since I stopped listening to activists) to read that plans for a ‘Green Network’ (to be launched in May 2019) with 500 miles of walking and cycling routes connecting the city centre to parks and nature areas, ALREADY has some 60% of the access network is already in place.

Listening to the whining noises always coming from cycling activists, you could be forgiven for thinking that figure was closer to 0% than 60%.

The network includesCuningar Woodland Park, Pollok Country Park, Glasgow Botanic Gardens, Kelvingrove Park and Castle Semple Country Park.

The Cunningar Loop Bridge was a great addition, over the River Clyde and the Clyde Walkway, as it meant no longer having to go from Shettleston, almost to Rutherglen, to get to the park, as it connected it at Dalmarnock, just past Parkhead.

Cunningar Bridge River

Cunningar Bridge River

The only one listed which I haven’t touched is Castle Semple Country Park, which is simply the furthest from me, and I’d never even heard of. Apart from the Botanics, I can reach all the others via cycle paths or cycle routes.

The Glasgow and Clyde Valley Green Network has prepared a blueprint, on behalf of the eight local authorities in the Glasgow City Region, which aims to make outdoor areas easily accessible for everyone in the region.

Probably the most relevant aspect is the identification of areas that need to be addressed to ‘Join the dots’, as the most frustrating thing I come across is spots where I find I’m between safe/quiet roads/routes, with no obvious means of connecting the two.

Filling in these gaps would vastly improve the existing networks.

A report to the City Region Cabinet states: “The blueprints identify what already currently contributes to the two networks that should be protected and if necessary improved, and where there are gaps in provision that need to be delivered.

“The blueprint will contribute to delivering sustainable inclusive economic growth and increasing wellbeing by contributing to making the Glasgow City Region a successful, sustainable place where people want to work and where they live healthy lives.”

They also hope the blueprint will make the region a natural, resilient place that improves and protects the environment, a connected place providing opportunities for exercise and mental wellbeing and a place that encourages active travel contributing to a low carbon economy.

Plan unveiled for ‘green network’ in Glasgow linking city centre to parks in the region

I hope they can do this without too many delays brought about from complaints by ‘special interest groups’, who must be heard, but seem to be taking far too much power for themselves nowadays, as opposed to being totally ignored in the past.

A better balance needs to be struck, as projects such as this can seem to spend far too long stuck in the dispute stage.

 

14/04/2019 Posted by | Civilian, Transport | , , | Leave a comment

Time to stop grovelling to activists and campaigners

I’m not going to mention any specifics, but I think it’s time that all the various activists, special interest groups, campaigners etc were shoved down the priority list and not ignored, but also not given the apparent power they seem to have gained by being not the most RELEVANT voices, but the LOUDEST!

I could rhyme of a list of about five or so who appear in most stories about cycle lanes/routes, and transport realignment, and come to the planning table (and leave it) with one chorus, “We have been ignored” or, “We have not been prioritised”.

While all plans need to be consulted on, and modified as they are developed, the Byres Road plan is a pretty good example of what I refer to, as it is now not expected to start braking ground before the end of this year (2019), having been expected to start in December 2018.

Have a look at this article on the changes coming to this road, some of those I have in mind are mentioned:

Segregated cycle lanes and fewer parking bays feature in latest plan for Byres Road

I’ve even cycled in Byres Road, which is rather odd (the cycling, not the rad).

As a pedestrian, it looks terrible, packed with all sort of traffic.

Yet on the bike (and even observing from on board a bus), that apparent congestion seems to vanish when you are moving with it.

Also, the activists won’t like me for saying this, all but one or two drivers seem to give cyclist a wide berth – space permitting.

Dopey pedestrians and cellphone zombies are a bigger hazard.

In fact, I’m surprised there were cellphone activists at the meeting, whining about there being NO LANE FOR THEM in the plan!

Cellphone Lane

Cellphone Lane

Update

Just saw this, and HAD to include it – a real phone zombie gem…

And then there was…

SmartphoneZombies.jpg

25/03/2019 Posted by | Civilian, Transport | , , , , | Leave a comment

Time to stop grovelling to activists and campaigners

I’m not going to mention any specifics, but I think it’s time that all the various activists, special interest groups, campaigners etc were shoved down the priority list and not ignored, but also not given the apparent power they seem to have gained by being not the most RELEVANT voices, but the LOUDEST!

I could rhyme of a list of about five or so who appear in most stories about cycle lanes/routes, and transport realignment, and come to the planning table (and leave it) with one chorus, “We have been ignored” or, “We have not been prioritised”.

While all plans need to be consulted on, and modified as they are developed, the Byres Road plan is a pretty good example of what I refer to, as it is now not expected to start braking ground before the end of this year (2019), having been expected to start in December 2018.

Have a look at this article on the changes coming to this road, some of those I have in mind are mentioned:

Segregated cycle lanes and fewer parking bays feature in latest plan for Byres Road

I’ve even cycled in Byres Road, which is rather odd (the cycling, not the rad).

As a pedestrian, it looks terrible, packed with all sort of traffic.

Yet on the bike (and even observing from on board a bus), that apparent congestion seems to vanish when you are moving with it.

Also, the activists won’t like me for saying this, all but one or two drivers seem to give cyclist a wide berth – space permitting.

Dopey pedestrians and cellphone zombies are a bigger hazard.

In fact, I’m surprised there were cellphone activists at the meeting, whining about there being NO LANE FOR THEM in the plan!

Cellphone Lane

Cellphone Lane

25/03/2019 Posted by | Civilian, Transport | , , , , | Leave a comment

Let me fix that for you

As I passed through Kelvingrove Park recently, I noticed the damned vegan activists had been defacing the place with their protest graffiti.

Fortunately, only in chalk this time, so no damage done.

But it’s still very irritating.

I saw one attempt at cleverness which they didn’t seem to have quite right – so I fixed it for them…

Kelvingrove Park Graffiti

Kelvingrove Park Graffiti

I also came across this video around the same time, and quite liked the sentiment contained within.

In fact, I think I’ll keep a note of the link – if you just replace the word ‘vegan’ with the name of whatever activist has just alienated you from whatever cause they were blubbering on about, it still works 🙂

As I’ve recently noted (quite a few times more than I’d liked to have), the cycling activists and the environmental activists are just going over the same stuff again, and again, and again… apparently so busy trying to convince people that THEY are right while EVERYONE ELSE is wrong, that they have failed to notice  the changes that have been since they started whining. Or, perhaps have just chosen to ignore them, as that would put them out of a ‘job’.

20/03/2019 Posted by | Civilian, photography | , | Leave a comment

Two interesting articles on University Avenue

Since I occasionally visit The Hunterian, I have cycled on University Avenue.

Admittedly not often (I dive into the university grounds at the earliest opportunity), and usually not on the other side of the road (from The Hunterian). The road has also been liberally sprinkled with assorted roadworks on those occasions, so I didn’t realise it was a controversial place.

That said, having read about other changes nearby, I’m a little surprised to read the comments about ‘Paint only’ segregation, as opposed to more robust separation. Having been on Byres Road too, I’m pretty sure I’d have a won a bet with myself had I heard about the ‘Paint only’ proposal, and made a bet that somebody would make a fuss.

Not sure if reading the articles gives the true picture, or if this is more damned ‘cycling activists’ at work.

Having read the details of other routes being created around the city, it seems odd that the council would have approved this if the dangers are as claimed, and that the plan will result in a reduction to existing safety.

It’s sad, but I’m now so fed up listening to them ‘talk up’ dangers as they see them, that I largely switch off as soon as they start whining. I’m beginning to think they’ll do more harm than good, by alienating people who would otherwise be open to less exaggerated claims.

I’ll be interested to see if these stories are followed by news of changes, or clarification to what is actually being done.

And even more interested to hear that any ‘unsafe’ option have been rectified.

Glasgow residents form human bike lane in protest of ‘unsafe’ cycling at University Avenue

Work on new ‘super-crossings’ to begin at University Avenue

Perhaps the activists would like this pic of these little known benches, depicting autopsy benches near University Avenue, to help their campaigns? I feel sure they could make up some stories about them.

Glasgow University Autopsy Benches

Glasgow University Autopsy Benches

11/02/2019 Posted by | Civilian, council, Transport | , , | Leave a comment

More damned activists

Once again, I find myself flying in the face of Glasgow tradition – and commending the measured response of Glasgow City Council in the face of yet more useless provocation from yet another bunch of bullies activists.

Protesters disrupted a Glasgow City Council meeting to demand urgent action on climate change.

Members of Extinction Rebellion interrupted councillors to deliver their message on “impending disasters” caused by climate breakdown.

Some councillors walked out as one protester read out a speech, ignoring committee convener Bailie Malcolm Balfour’s request to sit down.

However, the committee later invited Extinction Rebellion to join its newly-approved emergency group, which aims to deal with the dangers of climate change.

Climate change protesters interrupt Glasgow City Council meeting

As usual, it’s the activists’ way, or no way…

“We are Extinction Rebellion and we will be on the right side of history.”

In a commendable act fo restraint, rather than calling security and throwing them into the street, councillors extended an invitation to the protestors to take part in future debate….

When the meeting resumed, Mr Balfour told protesters: “There may be room for you to be a member of the group. Your voice will be heard. It’s not the done thing to disrupt a meeting.”

Vice convener Martha Wardrop, who will chair the emergency group, said: “We appreciate you putting forward your views.

“We’d be delighted to involve you in work in the next few months. You have to have respect for the council’s policies and procedures.”

Councillor Maggie McTernan said: “Climate justice is a matter of moral justice as well. It’s really important to remember it will affect those who are disadvantaged first.

“It’s important to engage with people who are motivated, and also people who are not keen, uncertain or opposed.

“If we don’t do this together it’s not going to work.”

Well…

I’ll wait and see.

For how long this lasts past the first meeting where ‘they don’t get all they want.

And they walk out, whining on with their usual song of ‘Nobody’s doing what we say they should’.

Activists

07/02/2019 Posted by | Civilian, council | , , , | Leave a comment

So, I’m not the only one that’s sick and tired of activists exaggerating everything

After almost deciding it was just too dangerous to move out of my own little bubble in the burbs, and risk my life cycling through the city centre of Glasgow, after reading the ‘advice’ published in cycling forum populated by cycling activists whose sole job seems to spreading the lie that the city’s roads are dangerous, drivers are out to kill any cyclist that crossed their path, and that I will be choked and die from the pollution – I tried it, and found they were talking shi (sorry) nonsense.

Now it seems I have a friend, no less than Chief executive of the Edinburgh Fringe Society, Shona McCarthy, who has dared to say the same as me as regards the motivation and interests of ‘activists’…

Activists have singled out C Venues for “overworking, underpaying and generally mistreating their staff.” But Ms McCarthy also criticised the Fair Fringe campaign for “vilifying” promoters and depicting them as “evil megalomaniacs.” She suggested its activists were more interested in “hyperbole” and “exaggeration” than facts about the Fringe landscape and the different business models behind venues.

Edinburgh Fringe venues ‘won’t be banned’ over exploitation claims

I think it’s time MORE people stood up to these self-interested bullies, who seem to think their views should be accepted as truth, without test, review, or challenge, because ‘THEY’ claim the moral high ground, and should therefore not be question, just have their dogma universally accepted.

Activists

07/02/2019 Posted by | Civilian | | Leave a comment

Cloud cuckoo land – or where all the damned activists must (want to) live

I’m usually a fairly tolerant person, but I have to confess that I find myself tending to lose patience with all the activists and campaigners who seem to be popping up these days, making absurd claims and demands.

I’ve already poked the cycling activists in the eye after now spending a year cycling in Glasgow, and the city centre, where I was scared to go after reading the activists’ warning about how dangerous it was there, how the place was ‘gridlocked’, and how my health would suffer as I fought my way through clouds of pollution.

Sorry, ain’t seen none of that, and often cycle through almost deserted streets, maybe a little busy at peak times.

Then there are the various Green Loonies, who keep going on and on and on endlessly whining about pollution of all sorts, also telling us traffic is killing us in droves, or that waste is not being tackled, or that recycling needs to be addressed.

While I wouldn’t say things are perfect by any means, these things are being addressed (in the real world, and in real world ways, which are never fast enough for activists), and more ‘joined up’ systems are needed, but these changes take time.

The latest lot I just spotted have come up with this gem…

They (Get Glasgow Moving) want to see the creation of a publicly-owned bus company and transport authority, affordable, integrated ticketing and a city-wide smartcard for across transport networks, bike hire stations with free access for concessions, and a “coordinated, long-term vision and investment”.

A statement from organisers reads: “Most people in Glasgow rely on public transport to get around (only 49 per cent of households have cars), yet our public transport network is a total mess.

“Investing in public transport is essential for expanding our city’s economy, addressing inequality and social isolation, reducing toxic levels of air pollution and tackling climate change.

“Bickering between political parties is letting Glasgow down. We are decades behind other cities in providing affordable and sustainable transport.”

A rally to demand better public transport in Glasgow is happening tomorrow

They seem to have selective myopia, and don’t even see their own ‘success’ – just blindly keep whining on and on…

The petition was originally handed in to elected members eight months ago and chiefs at the campaign group have now been invited to the council’s HQ to discuss their aims further at a committee meeting.

Then again, there’s probably an “Activist’s Handbook” that instruct them never to acknowledge even the slightest success, otherwise the “enemy” will see it as a sign of weakness, and take stuff back.

I used to think many such groups deserved support, and I’m sure there are some good and honourable ones out there.

But nowadays, I think they seem to fail when their aims and claims are reviewed and tested against reality.

For example, in their above manifesto, to say “our public transport network is a total mess” is really ridiculous, and an insult to the intelligence of the reader.

It may not be perfect, but that’s far from any sort of justification to exaggerate in such a blatantly provocative way.

On the bright side – always consider that we live in a country where we CAN have them (and better still, can ignore them,or even poke fun) 🙂

Activists

If you want a good example of a BAD activist, and one who has far too much time on his hands (assuming ‘he’ is an individual and not an activist group posing as an individual), then have a look at the Comment area after this article: Scotland ‘could be net-zero for greenhouse gas emissions’

Even though I no longer read these (and tend to refer them as ‘Moron areas’, my brief glances are enough to see that contributor ‘GeorgeH’ is some sort of single-issue activist who plays out like broken record, repeating the same mindless dogma time after time, as if constant repetition will either turn into facts, or convince people to believe.

Update

In a later article, there was some more info…

More than 10,000 bus users have signed a petition calling for a world-class publicly owned transport service across Glasgow.

Members of the Get Glasgow Moving campaign have asked councillors to call for an amendment to the Transport Bill, which is being finalised at the Scottish Parliament.

Petitioners want a publicly-owned system where operators can run both commercial and non-commercial routes.

They presented their case to councillors on Thursday afternoon before meeting with Transport Minister Michael Matheson at Holyrood.

This went on to give some insight into the strangely distorted working of the logic of campaigners’ minds…

Ellie Harrison, founder of the movement said: “We are a volunteer-run grassroots campaign set-up in 2016 to demand a world-class, fully-integrated and accessible, publicly-owned transport network for everyone in our city.

“I’m sure you’ll be aware, most people in Glasgow don’t have access to a car including nearly all of our campaign members.

Previously, their claim was…

A statement from organisers reads: “Most people in Glasgow rely on public transport to get around (only 49 per cent of households have cars), yet our public transport network is a total mess.

Note the careful, quiet, change from ‘households‘, to ‘people‘, and that they reveal ‘nearly all of our campaign members’ don’t have access to a car.

That suggest to me that they are a special interest group, NOT representative of the wider population!

It’s also amusing to see them cite a Munich bases system as their model – probably forgetting that Germany’s taxation and public funding regime is not the same as Scotland’s.

Perhaps this group thinks a wand can be waved, and the money for the bus system they want will appear by magic.

But…

I’m spending far too much time on this, so read the rest of the fun here…

Campaigners call on council for publicly-owned bus service

Full disclosure

In case anyone thinks I drive, I DON’T, the best I can afford now is good shoes, and a bike.

I rather like getting on a train two or three times a year, but have not been on a bus for about twenty years, or maybe more.

23/01/2019 Posted by | Civilian, council | , , | Leave a comment

Damned activists – no sense of humour, and no credibility

I don’t know if it’s just me, but I’m really coming to the conclusion that activists are becoming increasingly desperate to protect their ‘jobs’.

While there was a place for them in the past, when the public was poorly educated about their issues, and there wasn’t the amount of information floating around that we now have thanks to the Internet, these single-minded agenda groups are becoming tiresome.

While it may be my opinion that many of them are almost redundant today, such has been the progress of the issues they were once able to campaign reasonably for, they are beginning to turn into the ‘Nazi Hunters’ of their chosen causes.

That’s NOT a derogatory comment about Nazi Hunters, merely a realisation that their time has come, and that the last few genuine Nazi war criminals are so old, and have evaded justice for so long, that there is no real point in pursuing them. Most have lost their minds, or are so ill that even if found completely guilty, no court will send them to jail (and have to look after them).

A couple of activist items in the news suggests they need to be viewed with care now, as their claims become increasingly dubious.

First was the calim of Greggs vegan sausage rolls being dumped daily…

Rumours are circulating on social media that a couple are buying up vegan sausage rolls from Greggs and binning them in protest – but staff are denying it.

A Facebook post by Vegan Glasgow states that a man and woman have been regularly buying a large quantity of vegan sausage rolls from Greggs in Buchanan Bus Station and throwing them directly in the bin.

The post reads: “Vegan Glasgow has been contacted today by more than one of our community of page followers about a man and woman who go into Greggs at Buchanan Bus Station, Glasgow every day in the morning and buy 40 Vegan Sausage Rolls and put them ALL in the bin!

Confusion over claims Glasgow Greggs’ customers ‘binning’ £40 of vegan sausage rolls every day

While I’m not touching Facecrook to check, there seems to be no evidence in the form of pics or video to support this.

If there is, it’s certainly not mentioned in the articles, so Vegan Glasgow loses any credibility for not providing evidence, which would b easy enough to provide from any mobile phone nowadays.

Then there was the silly reaction to a bit of fun from Poundland…

It’s the thought that counts when giving presents – or is it?

Discount retailer Poundland has caused controversy with its latest Valentine’s Day gift, a heart-shaped package with nothing in it.

The Gift of Nothing, naturally priced at £1, is intended as “a bit of fun”, says the retailer.

But Friends of the Earth and other campaign groups have complained that whatever Poundland was thinking about, it certainly wasn’t the environment.

Julian Kirby, Friends of the Earth’s lead campaigner on plastics, criticised its use of “wasteful plastics”, adding: “Let’s hope folly like this goes unloved and doesn’t reappear.”

Another campaigner, Sian Sutherland of A Plastic Planet, said: “This product is designed to go straight into the bin, but will last for 500 years.

“It is a symbol of everything that is wrong with our view of the world.”

Poundland ‘gift of nothing’ sparks criticism

Their logic is so badly flawed I’m tempted not to point out that…

Had there been ‘something’ in the packaging, then packaging would have been binned.

As it is, the packaging IS the something!

So I suspect less of those will go in the bin as people keep the joke item as a fun memory or keepsake.

In fact, if you think about it and apply the activist’s logic, this is a product they should be ENDORSING…

After all, it actually has NO PACKAGING AT ALL!

So…

Like I say…

SAVE US FROM THE ACTIVISTS!

Poundland Gift of Nothing Pic Credit @KimxPxPA

Poundland Gift of Nothing Pic Credit @KimxPxPA

23/01/2019 Posted by | Civilian | , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: